Categories:

The risk isn’t that AI will write our materials for us, but that it will remove the occasions on which we become the kind of teachers who can judge those materials well.

On November 30, 2022, OpenAI released its artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT to the public. It was an immediate success and gained one million users in the first five days. At the time I was working as an ELT materials writer, and I put this new toy to use straight away. No more staring at a blank page for hours. No more hours spent crafting the perfect audio transcript. Just type a prompt, watch the output appear, and there you have it. When AI tools for educators first arrived, the promise was very simple: they would save us valuable time that could be used for other things. In reality what actually happened is we had to spend a great deal of time fixing these AI outputs.

As an experienced trainer and material writer, I was able to modify what I was getting out of the AI. I already knew what worked well in the classroom. I could spot a weak output at a glance and make the necessary changes. One could almost say I have internalised some good standards for level, for pedagogical structure, and for competencies. When AI gives me a first draft, I don’t outsource my pedagogical judgment.

But what if you’re early in your career, or you’re writing materials for the first time? How can you apply judgement to something that you’ve never learned to judge? The output looks great on the surface. It has headings, a numbering system, an answer key. It uses reasonable target vocabulary that you feel are probably good for the level. On the surface everything can look perfect, however there might be issues that are not immediately visible. For example: do the comprehension questions proceed from gist to more specific information gaps? Do the distractors make sense, or can the learners eliminate them without even reading the text? Is the vocabulary level really correct for the target group, or are some advanced terms going to derail the whole task?

If you’ve never written a worksheet from scratch, built an answer key, or assessed the level of an audio, you may have no internalised sense of what the right level of difficulty feels like on the page. You are not able to assess your worksheet because you have not yet developed a standard to do that. There is also very little published material available to help you develop these skills.

Then there is the risk of cognitive offloading – the idea that you will lose your judgement if you delegate everything to AI. This is a serious risk, but what if you have not even developed that sense of judgement? Since we have already observed that judgement is gained by writing your own worksheets, you will not gain that experience at all if all your work is delegated. In the end, there will be a whole cohort of trainers and material writers who do not have these skills, because they never engaged in the creative process themselves. Either material writers will:

Lose the skills they have acquired

Because of cognitive offloading onto AI tools.

Never gain these skills at all

Because of excessive task delegation from the outset.

AI can reduce the labour involved and increase your productivity, but it can affect the development of the material writer in a very negative way if it is allowed to. We get teachers who can produce materials faster than ever, but have no idea whether those materials are any good. The solution is to be more disciplined about using AI in the first place.

Workflows you can automate

There are different trainer workflows that can be automated. Some of these assist the materials writer but do not involve delegating the entire creative process – for example, stages 1, 2 and 4.

1

Ideation tasks

Data analysis, research, ideation/brainstorming, planning.

2

Planning content

Designing a syllabus or a lesson.

3

Creating content

Vocabulary lists, texts and dialogues, questions, exercises, role cards, scenarios, trainer notes, and answer keys.

4

Refining content

Refining, rewriting, editing, or changing the writing style.

Three tiers of material production

There are three tiers of material production: assisting, delegating and outsourcing. These involve different levels of AI use.

Tier 1 · Assisting

Materials written by the content writer

Generative AI is used during the ideation stages, including brainstorming, lesson planning, and research.

Tier 2 · Delegating

Generative AI used in the writing process

Prompts are designed to create complete activities. The material is then edited and reviewed by the writer, fact-checked, and reviewed for bias.

Tier 3 · Outsourcing

Generative AI does everything

Prompts are used to design courses, choose target vocabulary/grammar, create complete activities, and edit the final result.

To minimise the negative effects, it is wise to limit AI use to mainly assisting, and if you have to delegate writing tasks, do at least 20% of your workflow manually. For example, write one complete lesson from scratch per week. This is going to help you develop your pedagogical standards to an acceptable level. Compare your original work to AI-generated versions of the same task, so that you make your own criteria visible to yourself. Avoid outsourcing everything to AI, as that will lead to a loss of your critical judgement.

Before you generate anything, make sure you are clear about the purpose of the material, what output you expect, and what would cause you to reject it. These will become key criteria to assess the output. Keep a record of all materials you wrote entirely on your own. List all the defects you caught in AI output and why they mattered. Make a list of tasks you won’t delegate and the reasoning behind that. If you’re early in your career and a novice materials writer, find experienced colleagues who know how to write their own materials without AI. Ask them if they are willing to look at some AI-generated work and check if the criteria hold true. You’re not looking for someone to tell you whether AI is good or bad. You’re looking for someone who can help you build and test your own standards.

The debate about AI in education keeps asking: will AI make teachers worse at their jobs? That’s the wrong question. The right question is: under what conditions will teachers, especially novices, form the skills that make AI use professionally safe? Teacher education programmes need to design opportunities to develop standards explicitly, not hope they emerge by accident.

Use cases for generative AI in ELT

The use cases for generative AI in ELT are very extensive. The table below will give you an idea of how you can use AI to transform your everyday work.

Use caseExample applications
Material creation
Generating ideas for contentBrainstorming lesson topics, themes, and task types
Finding multiple perspectivesExploring different cultural or professional viewpoints on a topic
Defining learner personasCreating detailed profiles of target learners for materials design
Syllabus creationDesigning course outlines, learning objectives, and progression
Lesson planningStructuring lessons, timing activities, sequencing tasks
Creating classroom and digital learning contentWriting texts, dialogues, exercises, interactive activities
Writing task instructionsDrafting clear, level-appropriate instructions for activities
Iterating, editing and improving contentRevising drafts, refining language, improving clarity
Analysing writing stylesIdentifying features of genres, registers, or author styles
Changing writing stylesAdapting texts to different levels, tones, or genres
Creating titles and headlinesWriting engaging titles for lessons, units, or materials
Creating or selecting images for lessonsGenerating image prompts or selecting appropriate visuals
Summarising complex informationCondensing articles, reports, or research for learners
Getting expert adviceConsulting AI as a subject-matter expert on content topics
Creating email templatesDrafting communications with learners, colleagues, or stakeholders
Creating reference materialProducing grammar guides, vocabulary lists, glossaries
Generating guidelines and checklistsCreating rubrics, self-assessment tools, quality criteria
Creating FAQsAnticipating learner questions and drafting answers
Generating grading rubricsDesigning assessment criteria for tasks and projects
Generating feedback on learner outputProviding comments on writing, speaking, or task performance
Analysing and interpreting dataReviewing learner performance data, survey results, or usage metrics
Writing answer keysProducing correct answers and explanations for exercises
Creating role cards and scenariosDesigning role-play prompts, case studies, simulations
Adapting authentic textsSimplifying or modifying real-world texts for specific levels
Creating audio scriptsWriting dialogues or monologues for listening activities
Designing assessment tasksWriting test items, quizzes, or performance tasks
Marketing
Market analysisResearching trends, competitor offerings, learner needs
SEO optimisationImproving visibility of course pages, blogs, or resources
Creating user personasDefining target audiences for marketing campaigns
Analysing sales dataInterpreting enrollment trends, conversion rates, revenue
Identifying target groupsSegmenting audiences by level, profession, or goals
Generating keywordsFinding search terms for content and advertising
Creating meta descriptionsWriting summaries for web pages and course listings
Creating ideas for postsBrainstorming social media and blog content
Generating LinkedIn postsDrafting professional updates and thought leadership content
Creating marketing copyWriting promotional text for courses, programmes, or services
Writing white papersProducing in-depth reports on methodologies or outcomes
Creating email campaignsDesigning nurture sequences and promotional emails
Writing case studiesDocumenting learner success stories and programme impact
Creating landing page contentWriting persuasive copy for course sign-up pages
Training
Using AI as a subject-matter expertConsulting AI for content knowledge in specialised domains
AI conversational partnersPractising speaking with AI chatbots or voice agents
Generating feedback on learner writing and speakingProviding automated or semi-automated comments on output
Creating lesson reportsSummarising learner progress, attendance, or achievement
Creating trainer guides and notesWriting teaching instructions, timing suggestions, and tips
Generating professional development contentCreating training materials for teachers on AI use
Simulating learner errorsProducing examples of common mistakes for analysis tasks
Creating differentiation optionsAdapting tasks for mixed-level or special-needs groups
Generating extension activitiesProducing additional tasks for fast finishers or homework
Supporting learner autonomyCreating self-study guides, independent practice tasks
Facilitating telecollaborationDesigning tasks for virtual exchange or international projects
Creating reflective promptsWriting questions for learner journals or self-assessment
Generating peer-review guidelinesDesigning criteria and instructions for peer feedback
Supporting needs analysisCreating surveys, interview questions, or diagnostic tasks
Creating progress trackersDesigning tools for learners to monitor their own development
Administrative and operational
Scheduling and timetablingOrganising classes, sessions, or teacher assignments
Writing policy documentsDrafting institutional policies, guidelines, or procedures
Creating onboarding materialsProducing welcome packs, orientation content for learners or staff
Generating meeting agendas and minutesStructuring and documenting team or department meetings
Writing grant proposals and reportsDrafting funding applications and progress reports
Creating surveys and questionnairesDesigning feedback forms, needs analysis tools
Translating and localising contentAdapting materials for different languages or cultural contexts
Managing learner recordsOrganising and summarising learner data and progress

The image above is AI generated.

Tags:

Comments are closed